Shipstead-Luce Appendix
19 June 2003

RECOMMENDATION: No objection to the issuance of permit for proposed installation of rooftop antenna as shown in supplemental drawings received and dated 6 June 2003. Note is made that permit application is pending final zoning review. Any modifications to the approved design as a result of further reviews in the permit process must be submitted to the Commission for consideration.

RECOMMENDATION: No objection to the issuance of permit for proposed replacement sign as shown in supplemental information received and dated 9 June 2003.

RECOMMENDATION: No objection to the issuance of permit for proposed renovation and addition as shown in drawings received and dated 6 June 2003. Any modifications to the approved design as a result of further reviews in the permit process must be submitted to the Commission for consideration. (See previous case S.L.03-055)

RECOMMENDATION: No objection to the issuance of permit for proposed renovation and addition as shown in supplemental drawings received and dated 18 June 2003.

RECOMMENDATION: No objection to the issuance of permit for proposed roof deck replacement as shown in supplemental drawings received and dated 18 June 2003, provided railing is painted to match existing building.

RECOMMENDATION: Returned without Action. Property is outside the jurisdiction of the Shipstead-Luce Act and therefore does not come under the Commission’s review. Refer to Historic Preservation Review Board.

RECOMMENDATION: No objection to the issuance of permit for proposed replacement sign as shown in drawings received and dated 6 June 2003.

RECOMMENDATION: No objection to the issuance of permit for proposed replacement sign as shown in drawings received and dated 6 June 2003.

RECOMMENDATION: No objection to the issuance of permit for proposed replacement sign as shown in supplemental drawings received and dated 18 June 2003, provided background color matches existing sign.

RECOMMENDATION: Returned without Action. Property is outside the jurisdiction of the Shipstead-Luce Act and therefore does not come under the Commission’s review. Refer to Historic Preservation Review Board and National Capitol Planning Commission.

RECOMMENDATION: No objection to the issuance of permit for the repair of mansard roof, including replacement of slate and flashing, as shown in drawings received and dated 6 June 2003.

RECOMMENDATION: No objection to the concept for proposed condominium conversion, including new stair enclosures and ventilators on roof, new terraces at B1 level, and new canopies for existing surface parking, as shown in drawings received and dated 6 June 2003. The applicant is requested to work with staff during the further development of the project, prior to submission for permit review.

RECOMMENDATION: Returned without action. Property is outside the jurisdiction of the Shipstead-Luce Act and should be reviewed as a direct submission to the Commission as District of Columbia property with a request for review in writing from the Government of the District of Columbia. However, application currently lacks sufficient information. File new submission of working drawings for sign installation, including details, and photographs of existing conditions, with permit application for review by the Commission when ready.

RECOMMENDATION: Returned without Action. Property is outside the jurisdiction of the Shipstead-Luce Act and therefore does not come under the Commission’s review.

RECOMMENDATION: No objection to the issuance of permit for proposed storefront sign as shown in supplemental drawings received and dated 18 June 2003, provided revised design includes Chinese characters per the requirements of the Chinese Historic District. Recommend AGAINST issuance of permit for proposed banner signs as shown in drawings received and dated 6 June 2003. Any further modifications to the approved design as a result of further reviews in the permit process must be submitted to the Commission for consideration.

RECOMMENDATION: Returned without Action. Property is outside the jurisdiction of the Shipstead-Luce Act and therefore does not come under the Commission’s review.

RECOMMENDATION: No objection to the issuance of permit for proposed sign installation as shown in drawings received and dated 6 June 2003.

RECOMMENDATION: No objection to the issuance of permit for proposed awnings as shown in drawings received and dated 6 June 2003, provided awning is connected to window frame leaving stone intact. In addition, there should be no logo or lettering on awnings nor lighting on the building with the exception of internal, under-canopy lights affixed directly to awning frame.

RECOMMENDATION: No objection to the issuance of permit for proposed revised pedestrian connector as shown in drawings received and dated 6 June 2003. (See previous case S.L.02-078)

RECOMMENDATION: No objection to the issuance of permit for the proposed ATM installation as shown in supplemental drawings received and dated 13 June 2003, provided the sill stone is retained for future replacement. Recommend AGAINST any additional lighting on the building with the exception of internal, under-canopy lights affixed directly to awning frame.

RECOMMENDATION: Returned without Action. Property is outside the jurisdiction of the Shipstead-Luce Act and therefore does not come under the Commission’s review.

RECOMMENDATION: No objection to the concept for proposed 3-story addition as shown in drawings received and dated 6 June 2003. Note is made that permit application is pending final zoning review. Any modifications to the approved design as a result of further reviews in the permit process must be submitted to the Commission for consideration.