Old Georgetown Appendix: CFA Meeting — 18 September 2003

Returned without Action. Case was withdrawn by request of applicant until future submission of new permit application. Note is made that permit application is pending final zoning review which should be resolved prior to further review.

No objection to concept design for proposed roof over side entrance deck as shown in supplemental drawings received and dated 25 August 2003 which indicate a shed roof with only two posts to cover entire deck. File new submission of working drawings, including dimensions and details, with permit application for review by the Commission when ready. Note is made that permit application is pending final zoning review which must be resolved prior to further review. Case may require BZA approval.

No objection to issuance of permit for proposed one-story addition to the front of the building in private property, as shown in supplemental drawings received and dated September 2003 which indicate sliding windows, metal roof and brick planters and for two signs composed of 7-inch high lettering reading 'Cafe Milano' to match existing which will be removed. The Commission requests submission of a permit application for the existing rear addition, including proposed alterations, and for a resolution to the temporary handicapped ramp at Prospect Place, both installed without review or permit.

Recommend AGAINST issuance of permit for 2-story rear addition as proposed. Although there is no objection to a concept for a 2-story rear addition, the design as proposed does not comply with the Policy on Addition to Small Houses which states that additions should be subservient to original building. Second floor terrace and the parapet around it should be removed and replaced with a sloping roof to help decrease the apparent overall size of the new addition. See recommendations given under previous concept review (OG 03-120). Recommend side windows, which are less than 5' 0" from property lines, be deleted. Recommend use of one material for all walls on addition. File separate submission of working drawings for revised design, including dimensions and details, with permit application for review by the Commission when ready. Note is made that permit application is pending final zoning review which should be resolved prior to further review.

Returned without Action. Case superseded by new permit application under case OG 03-290.

No objection to issuance of permit for proposed installation of iron railing on stoop, already in place, and for fence no taller than 12–inches high around tree planter on public space, PROVIDED it complies with Public Space guidelines.

Returned without Action. Submitted materials and a site visit of 12 August 2003 indicate that proposed replacement fence at rear will not be visible from public thoroughfare. Refer to the Historic Preservation Review Board.

No objection to issuance of permit for proposed alterations to rear of 1789 Restaurant, already in progress, including re–building of rear addition, new wood louvered screen for mechanical equipment on roof of addition, and alterations to porch enclosure with new doors with frosted–glass. Applicant agreed to re–design fence, which inappropriately encroaches on the front of adjacent property, and submit working drawings, including dimensions and details, with new permit application for review by the Commission before 11 December 2003. Commission regrets that work on exterior started prior to review and permit.

Recommend AGAINST concept design for new rowhouse on lot 74, which, as proposed, has not changed from previous concept design under case OG 03-47 which was NOT approved, will be too tall in relation to the two-story houses in the immediate neighborhood and will have an adverse impact on the historic character of this block. The historic character of the existing 1500 block of 32nd Street is defined by mostly two-story houses, the narrow street, and the existing large trees. The original concept design in 1998 proposed only two row houses in this location across the street from a one-story garage and a three-story house at the north corner with the alley. In that context, the concept had been approved. However, the addition of two more row houses to the south greatly increases the adverse impact to the Residentials across the street. Taken as a whole, the group of four houses should be no taller than two-stories high. All measures should be taken to protect the existing large trees, including further setbacks from the curb and careful studies of changes to the grading and installation of sidewalks. File new submission of revised concept design for four two-story high houses on the south end of the street for review by the Commission when ready. Note is made that the ANC 2E has appealed to BZA to review previous zoning rulings on this project.

Recommend AGAINST concept design for new rowhouse on lot 19, which, as proposed, has not changed from previous concept design under case OG 03-48 which was NOT approved, will be too tall in relation to the two-story houses in the immediate neighborhood and will have an adverse impact on the historic character of this block. The historic character of the existing 1500 block of 32nd Street is defined by mostly two-story houses, the narrow street, and the existing large trees. The original concept design in 1998 proposed only two row houses in this location across the street from a one-story garage and a three-story house at the north corner with the alley. In that context, the concept had been approved. However, the addition of this and a second new house to the row greatly increases the adverse impact to the Residentials across the street. Taken as a whole, the group of four houses should be no taller than two-stories high. All measures should be taken to protect the existing large trees, including further setbacks from the curb and careful studies of changes to the grading and installation of sidewalks. File new submission of revised concept design for four two-story high houses on the south end of the street for review by the Commission when ready. Note is made that the ANC 2E has appealed to BZA to review previous zoning rulings on this project.

Recommend AGAINST concept design for new rowhouse on lot 20, which, as proposed, has not changed from previous concept design under case OG 03-47 which was NOT approved, will be too tall in relation to the two-story houses in the immediate neighborhood and will have an adverse impact on the historic character of this block. The historic character of the existing 1500 block of 32nd Street is defined by mostly two-story houses, the narrow street, and the existing large trees. The original concept design in 1998 proposed only two row houses in this location across the street from a one-story garage and a three-story house at the north corner with the alley. In that context, the concept had been approved. However, the addition of this and a second new house to the row greatly increases the adverse impact to the Residentials across the street. Taken as a whole, the group of four houses should be no taller than two-stories high. All measures should be taken to protect the existing large trees, including further setbacks from the curb and careful studies of changes to the grading and installation of sidewalks. File new submission of revised concept design for four two-story high houses on the south end of the street for review by the Commission when ready. Note is made that the ANC 2E has appealed to BZA to review previous zoning rulings on this project.

Recommend AGAINST concept design for new rowhouse on lot 20, which, as proposed, has not changed from previous concept design under case OG 03-47 which was NOT approved, will be too tall in relation to the two–story houses in the immediate neighborhood and will have an adverse impact on the historic character of this block. The historic character of the existing 1500 block of 32nd Street is defined by mostly two–story houses, the narrow street, and the existing large trees. The original concept design in 1998 proposed only two row houses in this location across the street from a one–story garage and a three–story house at the north corner with the alley. In that context, the concept had been approved. However, the addition of this and a second new house to the row greatly increases the adverse impact to the Residentials across the street. Taken as a whole, the group of four houses should be no taller than two–stories high. All measures should be taken to protect the existing large trees, including further setbacks from the curb and careful studies of changes to the grading and installation of sidewalks. File new submission of revised concept design for four two–story high houses on the south end of the street for review by the Commission when ready. Note is made that the ANC 2E has appealed to BZA to review previous zoning rulings on this project.

No objection to issuance of permit for proposed replacement 6'-0" high horizontal board fence and gate using wood slats as thin as possible to match fences found along same side of alley. New wood fence must be stained. Commission regrets that detailing of original basket weave fence cannot be replicated.

No objection to issuance of permit for proposed construction of new library building within the campus of Dumbarton Oaks. Working drawings conform to approved concept design. See previous Recommendation (OG 02-324). Erect material sample panel on site for approval by the Commission prior to contracting for materials.

No objection to issuance of permit for proposed excavation and foundation work below grade and up to the existing grade ONLY in coordination with proposed construction of new library addition at Dumbarton Oaks which received prior concept approval. See previous Recommendation (OG 02-324). Applicant is made aware that changes to the design during final permit review may impact current foundation work.

Returned without Action. Submitted materials and a site visit of 12 August 2003 indicate that proposed replacement of roof deck at rear will not be visible from public thoroughfare. Refer to the Historic Preservation Review Board.

Recommend AGAINST issuance of permit for two existing pole–mounted signs that were installed without review or permit and, in conjunction with other signs on building, do not conform to code. Existing signs must be removed no later than 31 January 2004.Note is made that applicant did not appear at the public meeting.

Returned without Action. Submitted materials and a site visit of 12 August 2003 indicate that proposed replacement roof and maintenance work will not be visible from public thoroughfare. Refer to the Historic Preservation Review Board.

No objection to issuance of permit for proposed rear 2–story in–fill addition. Working drawings conform to approved concept design. See previous Recommendation (OG 02-252). Board of Zoning Adjustment granted zoning variance. Note is made that permit application is pending final zoning review. Any modifications to the approved design as a result of further review in the permit process must be submitted to the Commission for approval.

Recommend AGAINST issuance of permit for proposed projecting (blade) sign. Existing projecting sign, which was NOT approved, must be removed no later than 31 January 2004. See previous recommendation under OG 98-159. No objection to retention of letters reading "L'Occitane" on valance of awning, which had been installed without review or permit. Note is made that permit application is pending final zoning review. Any modifications to the approved design as a result of further review in the permit process must be submitted to the Commission for approval.

Returned without Action. Submitted materials and a site visit of 12 August 2003 indicate that proposed replacement deck and patio at rear will not be visible from public thoroughfare. Refer to the Historic Preservation Review Board.

No objection to issuance of permit for proposed replacement of existing slate roof with either a standing seam copper roof or a roof using synthetic slate.

No objection to issuance of permit for alterations, including raising height of rear fence to 7'–0" by installing lattice between extended posts, removal of trim and keystone at head of windows on rear, and removal of existing vinyl windows and installation of wood sashes to match originals also used on the row of houses, and as shown in a window sample to be reviewed on site. Commission regrets that windows had been installed and alterations completed prior to review and without a permit. Work to bring conditions into compliance must be completed no later than 31 January 2004.

No objection to issuance of permit for proposed conservatory addition at second floor level at rear. Working drawings conform to approved concept. See previous Recommendation (OG 03-227). See enclosed letter from the National Trust for Historic Preservation who holds an easement on this property.

No objection to issuance of permit for proposed conservatory addition at second floor level at rear. Working drawings conform to approved concept. See previous Recommendation (OG 03-227). See enclosed letter from the National Trust for Historic Preservation who holds an easement on this property.

No objection to issuance of permit for proposed alterations to storefront, including new wood doors and new sign composed of back–lit letters no taller than 12–inches high reading "Chipotle Mexican Grill" on a corten steel sign panel above door.

No objection to issuance of permit for revision to approved design for a new wood stoop rather than iron stoop. See previous Recommendation for the rest of the project (OG 03-263). Note is made that permit application is pending final zoning review. Any modifications to the approved design as a result of further review in the permit process must be submitted to the Commission for approval.

No objection to concept design for proposed handicapped accessto the Fellows Building and the Gardener's Cottage off S Street, and to the main house off 32nd Street, at the Dumbarton Oaks campus, as shown in supplemental drawings received and dated 8 September 2003 which indicate a side ramp and front and side steps at the main house entrance. File new submission of working drawings, including dimensions and details, with permit application for review by the Commission when ready.

No objection to issuance of permit for proposed alterations to rear slope of roof to add windows as shown in supplemental drawings received and dated 22 September 2003. Supplemental drawings indicate that a roof deck has been deleted from the permit application, rear portion of roof maintains existing pitch, and that alterations will not require change to the existing parapet wall of adjoining structure and will not add a brick parapet to the east. No objection to alterations to first floor level and new deck at rear yard. Note is made that permit application is pending final zoning review. Any modifications to the approved design as a result of further review in the permit process must be submitted to the Commission for approval.

No objection to issuance of permit for proposed sign scheme composed of a 2'–0" x 2'–4" plaque and 4–inch high pin–mounted bronze letters reading "International Law Institute" above entry door at the lower level at The Foundry. Note is made that permit application is pending final zoning review. Any modifications to the approved design as a result of further review in the permit process must be submitted to the Commission for approval.

No objection to issuance of permit for revision to approved design for front door to include a transom. See previous case (OG 03-233). Note is made that permit application is pending final zoning review. Any modifications to the approved design as a result of further review in the permit process must be submitted to the Commission for approval.

No objection to concept design for proposed pole–mounted sign reading "Sherman Pickey." File new submission of detailed drawings with permit application for review by the Commission whenready.

No objection to issuance of permit for proposed re–paving of existing curb–cuts for two driveways with soldier course brick paving, and for new brick paving on west driveway to garage entrance. Note is made that permit application is pending final zoning review. Any modifications to the approved design as a result of further review in the permit process must be submitted to the Commission for approval.

No objection to issuance of permit for revisions to previous permit design for enclosure of first floor level of side porch and for new pergola over side yard patio as shown in supplemental drawings received and dated 9 September 2003. Supplemental drawings indicate placement of pergola and patio paving to the rear of main block of the historic building to keep side wall exposed. Note is made that permit application is pending final zoning review. Any modifications to the approved design as a result of further review in the permit process must be submitted to the Commission for approval.

No objection to concept design for proposed 2–story rear addition which, as revised, retains the existing historic rear wing, raising its roof, and adds a new addition to its rear. File new submission of working drawings, including dimensions and details, with permit application for review by the Commission when ready.

No objection to issuance of permit for proposed rear addition and alterations as shown in supplemental drawings received and dated 4 September 2003 which indicate re–alignment of side stairs. Working drawings conform to approved concept design. See previous Recommendation (OG 03-213). Brick on new addition to match brick on existing house. Note is made that permit application is pending final zoning review. Any modifications to the approved design as a result of further review in the permit process must be submitted to the Commission for approval.

No objection to issuance of permit for proposed rear addition and alterations as shown in supplemental drawings received and dated 4 September and 25 September 2003 which indicate re–alignment of side stairs. Working drawings conform to approved concept design. See previous Recommendation (OG 03-213). Brick on new addition to match brick on existing house. Note is made that permit application is pending final zoning review. Any modifications to the approved design as a result of further review in the permit process must be submitted to the Commission for approval.

Recommend AGAINST issuance of permit for proposed replacement of windows on 3rd floor with tilt–sash kits that are not appropriate to this historic building. Recommend replacement of wood sashes in existing frame if windows cannot be repaired. File new submission of revised window details with permit application for review by the Commission when ready. Note is made that permit application is pending final zoning review which should be resolved prior to further review.

No objection to concept design for proposed removal of rear greenhouse addition and for new 2–story brick rear addition built on existing foundations as shown in Option A of supplemental drawings received and dated 4 September 2003 which indicate eave line of addition matching eave line of front facade. Recommend further study of rear facade to have windows consistent with rest of historic building. File new submission of working drawings, including dimensions and details, with permit application for review by the Commission when ready.

No objection to concept design for proposed alterations to garage door and windows on front facade as shown in supplemental drawings received and dated 25 August 2003. File new submission of working drawings, including dimensions and details, with permit application for review by the Commission when ready.

No objection to issuance of permit for proposed 2–story rear addition as shown in supplemental drawings received and dated 15 September 2003. There is no change to the front facade of historic building. Working drawings conform to approved concept design. See previous Recommendation (OG 03-151). Note is made that permit application is pending final zoning review. Any modifications to the approved design as a result of further review in the permit process must be submitted to the Commission for approval.

Recommend AGAINST issuance of permit for proposed installation of lettering reading "Zara" either on the window glass or on the back wall panel behind each of the windows on the second floor which is not appropriate within the historic district. See Recommendation under case OG 03-307. No objection to the installation of wall panels behind the windows, part of the interior display construction.

Recommend AGAINST issuance of permit for proposed complete overhaul and replacement of existing windows. Recommend careful study of conditions of existing windows with views to repair. If windows cannot be repaired, file new submission of survey, and details of proposed window sash replacement. Note is made that permit application is pending final zoning review which should be resolved prior to further review.

No objection to issuance of permit for proposed sign scheme composed of ONLY two 24–inch high back–lit signs as shown in supplemental drawings received and dated 10 September 2003, to be located between the second and third floor windows on the corner tower, PROVIDED all other signs on building and storefronts are removed. Commission recommends a waiver of the size limit in this case due to the large frontage of this corner building and the elimination of all existing or future sign clutter. Recommend AGAINST issuance of permit for proposed light fixtures to up–light and illuminate the walls. See proposed DC study on the Wisconsin Avenue Streetscape Project.

Returned without Action. Submitted materials and a site visit of 27 August 2003 indicate that proposed 1–story rear addition will not be visible from public thoroughfare. Refer to the Historic Preservation Review Board.

No objection to issuance of permit for proposed replacement windows in this 1955 non–contributing building.

Returned without Action. Submitted materials and a site visit of 27 August 2003 indicate that proposed 2–story rear addition will not be visible from public thoroughfare. Refer to the Historic Preservation Review Board.

No objection to issuance of permit for proposed replacement–in–kind of copper gutter on front porch.

No objection to issuance of permit for proposed 6–inch half round gutter to replace existing 5–inch half round gutter on rear wing.

No objection to issuance of permit for proposed replacement–in–kind of historic 'Jackson School' sign composed of 1'–6" high wood letters. Commission recommends waiver on the 12–inch height limit for signs as the proposed sign is a replica of a historic sign. Note is made that permit application is pending final zoning review. Any modifications to the approved design as a result of further review in the permit process must be submitted to the Commission for approval.

No objection to issuance of permit for proposed replacement of existing tin roof in disrepair with a standing seam copper roof and gutters to match details of existing.