Shipstead-Luce Appendix: CFA Meeting — 19 February 2004

No objection to the issuance of permit for proposed patio enclosure as shown in supplemental drawings received and dated 29 January 2004.

Recommend against issuance of permit for proposed new signs as shown in drawings received and dated 6 February 2004. Shield size and location is inappropriate for the building, as is the extensive illuminated band. Recommend further study of design. The applicant is requested to work with staff during further development of the project, prior to new submission for permit review.

No objection to the issuance of permit for proposed awning replacement as shown in supplemental drawings received and dated 6 February 2004, with the exception of text on each awning. Text should appear on the awning above the restaurant entrance exclusively. Refer to Historic Preservation Review Board.

No objection to the concept for proposed renovation and addition as shown in supplemental drawings received and dated 6 February 2004, with the exception of the roof construction on the existing structure and the windows of the new structure. No construction, including decks, terraces or enclosed spaces should occur at or on roof level of the existing structure. In addition, windows of the new structure should match windows in the existing structure with regard to height and lintel size. Suggest reduction of height of third floor bay to create a balcony, rather than interior space, allowing new structure to conform to existing neighborhood context. Refer to Historic Preservation Review Board.

No objection to the issuance of permit for proposed reconfiguration of existing planter and new ADA-access ramp as shown in drawings received and dated 6 February 2004.

Recommend against issuance of permit for proposed paved driveway with two retaining walls as shown in drawings received and dated 6 February 2004. Hardscape surface in front yard adversely impacts natural setting adjacent to the park.

No objection to the issuance of permit for proposed awning as shown in drawings received and dated 13 February 2004.

Recommend against issuance of permit for proposed cellular antennas and unmanned equipment cabinets as shown in drawings received and dated 6 February 2004. Location and quantity of additional roof equipment is inappropriate for open quality of roof parapet.