Other Submissions: OGB Meeting — 7 April 2016

Returned without Action. Permit application for replacement door has been inactive for an extended period of time. Note: Any subsequent modifications to the approved design, including those made during DCRA technical review, must be resubmitted to the Commission for approval prior to the issuance of a permit.

Returned without Action. Although the proposed pool would not be visible from a public thoroughfare, the Commission regrets the amount of hardscape proposed for this property. Refer to Historic Preservation Review Board. Note: Any subsequent modifications to the approved design, including those made during DCRA technical review, must be resubmitted to the Commission for approval prior to the issuance of a permit.

Returned without Action. Private property with crew board storage is outside of the jurisdiction of the Old Georgetown Act. Note: Any subsequent modifications to the approved design, including those made during DCRA technical review, must be resubmitted to the Commission for approval prior to the issuance of a permit.

Returned without Action. Submission materials for 7-foot tall fence along east property line which would be set back from front of building would not be visible from a public thoroughfare and existing front yard fencing would not change. Refer to Historic Preservation Review Board. Note: Any subsequent modifications to the approved design, including those made during DCRA technical review, must be resubmitted to the Commission for approval prior to the issuance of a permit.

Returned without Action. Submission materials and a site visit on 22 March 2016 indicate that proposed window would not be visible from a public thoroughfare. Refer to Historic Preservation Review Board. Note: Any subsequent modifications to the approved design, including those made during DCRA technical review, must be resubmitted to the Commission for approval prior to the issuance of a permit.

Returned without Action. Permit application with revised scope of work and a site visit on 22 March indicate that rear addition and alterations would not be visible from a public thoroughfare. Recommend that non-compatible light fixtures on the front elevation that were installed without review or a permit are removed and brick is repaired. Refer to Historic Preservation Review Board. Note: Any subsequent modifications to the approved design, including those made during DCRA technical review, must be resubmitted to the Commission for approval prior to the issuance of a permit.

Returned without Action. Permit application for site work and alterations to fence was withdrawn at the written request by the applicant. Note: Any subsequent modifications to the approved design, including those made during DCRA technical review, must be resubmitted to the Commission for approval prior to the issuance of a permit.

Returned without Action. Submission materials and a site visit on 22 March 2016 indicate that fenestration alterations would not be visible from a public thoroughfare. Refer to Historic Preservation Review Board.