Old Georgetown Appendix: CFA Meeting — 21 July 2005

No objection to general concept design for proposed addition to rear at second floor level as shown in supplemental drawings received and dated 24 June 2005. File new submission of working drawings, including dimensions, details, material samples and additional information on the context with adjacent properties, with permit application for review by the Commission when ready.

No objection to general concept for the proposed one-story and two-story additions to front and side yard of existing house as shown in supplemental drawings received and dated 7 July 2005, and for existing pool house, trellis, rear porch and entrance gates with paved walk, which were completed without review or permit. File new submission of working drawings, including dimensions and details, and material samples with permit application for review by the Commission when ready.

No objection to concept design for proposed alterations, including rear addition at second floor level and window replacements as shown in supplemental drawings received and dated 29 June 2005. File new submission of working drawings, including dimensions and details, with permit application for review by the Commission when ready.

No objection to concept design for proposed two-story rear addition as shown in supplemental drawings received and dated 24 June 2005. Recommend further study to lower eave line to head of windows on south facade. File new submission of working drawings, including dimensions and details, with permit application for review by the Commission when ready.

No objection to issuance of permit for proposed alterations to rear carriage house and rear yard, for reconstruction of front areaway and steps to basement entrance, and for new wood fence at rear property line and metal picket fence in front as shown in supplemental drawings received and dated 13 July 2005. Working drawings conform to approved concept. See previous Recommendation (OG 05-095).

No objection to issuance of permit for proposed replacement of double hung windows on rear facades of the White Gravenor Building PROVIDED depth of panning is reduced, particularly over sill, and for restoration of existing leaded glass windows on South facade overlooking the quadrangle. Recommend further study of replacement casement window with integral muntins, and installation of a mock-up sample for review by the Commission, prior to issuance of permit for their replacement or repair. Note is made that permit application is pending final Zoning review. Any modifications to the approved design as a result of further review in the permit process must be submitted to the Commission for approval.

No objection to issuance of permit for proposed two-story in-fill addition at rear courtyard. Working drawings conform to approved concept. See previous Recommendation (OG 05-158). Applicant agreed to bring other aspects of the project into compliance. See case OG 05-212.

Recommend AGAINST issuance of permit for two proposed projecting signs for 'GAP Kids - Baby GAP' which are inappropriate as they would add to the cluster of signs. Recommend further study of relocation of transom signs on front of storefront bay windows to the side of the bay window. File new submission of detailed drawings for revised sign scheme with permit application for review by the Commission when ready.

Recommend AGAINST issuance of permit for two proposed projecting signs for 'GAP' which are inappropriate as they would add to the cluster of signs. Recommend further study of modification to the existing GAP sign over entrance doors. File new submission of detailed drawings for revised sign scheme with permit application for review by the Commission when ready.

Returned without Action. Concept case superseded by permit application under case OG 05-224.

No objection to issuance of permit for proposed installation of a stealth flagpole for cellular antennas for T-Mobile to match existing pole at other corner of the Car Barn. Recommend property owner installs a flag on existing flagpole to match proposed flag. The building will have no other flagpoles or antennas.

Returned without Action. Even though the Commission could not approve the two story addition with the demolition of the historic rear wall as proposed, the project is referred to the Historic Preservation Review Board due to the amount of demolition that has already taken place without a permit.

No objection to issuance of permit for proposed replacement of windows to match existing detailing and dimensions on this 1984 building part of The Cloisters.

No objection to issuance of permit for proposed alterations to rear at basement level and excavation of rear yard for new parking space off alley as shown in supplemental drawings received and dated 7 July 2005. which indicate new wood railing on rear deck and replacement of wood stairs. New wood railing and wood fence and must be painted or stained.

Returned without Action. Submitted materials and a site visit of 17 June 2005 indicate that proposed replacement of glass-curtain wall will not be visible from public thoroughfare. Refer to the Historic Preservation Review Board.

No objection to concept design for proposed one-story rear addition and alterations to second floor porch as shown in either option. File new submission of working drawings, including dimensions and details, with permit application for review by the Commission when ready.

No objection to issuance of permit for proposed replacement of roof for repair of fire damage, for replacement of roof shingles to match adjoining roof, and for two new skylights that will not be visible from public thoroughfare as shown in supplemental drawings received and dated 21 and 24 June 2005. No objection to proposed repair of existing windows as indicated in supplemental information received and dated 5 July 2005. Note is made that permit application is pending final Zoning review. Any modifications to the approved design as a result of further review in the permit process must be submitted to the Commission for approval.

No objection to issuance of permit for proposed replacement of fire damaged windows and doors at rear. Existing windows in front facade must be repaired with missing parts replicated to match original, when needed, as indicated by applicant in supplemental information received and dated 19 July 2005. Replacement of front windows was NOT approved and has been deleted from this application.

No objection to issuance of permit for proposed Pella Architect Series LX all-wood double hung 6/6 replacement windows with ILT 7/8- inch muntins and frames to match existing, with use of half-screens, as shown in supplemental information received and dated 19 July and 3 August 2005 due to the poor condition beyond repair of the existing windows.

Recommend AGAINST issuance of permit for proposed replacement windows. Existing windows, which are a contributing element to the historic district, must be retained and repaired, with replication of damaged sections if necessary. The use of appropriate storm windows is acceptable.

No objection to concept design for proposed one-story side addition and rear roof terrace at second floor level. File new submission of working drawings, including dimensions and details, with permit application for review by the Commission when ready.

No objection to concept design for proposed alterations, including lighting scheme composed of light fixtures on party wall, on trellis posts and structure, and for removal of awnings and sign on party wall, light fixtures and fabric covering on trellis, and multi-light lampposts. The concept of installing Washington Globe lampposts was not approved. File new submission of working drawings, including dimensions, details and material samples, with permit application for review by the Commission when ready.

No objection to concept design for alterations to garage off alley for addition on garden side. File new submission of working drawings for review by the Commission when ready.

No objection to issuance of permit for proposed three-story rear yard addition for elevator enclosure as shown in supplemental drawings received and dated 6 July 2005. Proposed alterations and addition to the historic structure will be reversible. Working drawings conform to approved concept. See previous Recommendation (OG 05-187). Brick must match existing brick on rear wing. Erect a material sample panel on site facing South for review by the Commission prior to ordering materials.

Returned without Action. Submitted materials and a site visit of 6 July 2005 indicate that proposed replacement of damaged roof and roof repair will not be visible from public thoroughfare. Refer to the Historic Preservation Review Board. Permit application is for work on roof ONLY and does not include any additional exterior work or modifications to the existing cornice of front facade. The Commission notes the concern of the adjacent properties on work on the interior that must be applied for separately. Note is made that permit application is pending final Zoning review. Any modifications to the proposed design as a result of further review in the permit process that makes any part of the project visible from public space must be submitted to the Commission for review.

Returned without Action. Submitted materials and a site visit of 17 June 2005 indicate that proposed underground work for Remediation of Moisture Penetration on Tudor Place will not be visible from public thoroughfare. Surface will be returned to original condition. Refer to the Historic Preservation Review Board.

No objection to issuance of permit for proposed revision to entrance gates for new steel picket gates at entrance to driveway for the Dumbarton Oaks Gardener's Court as shown in supplemental drawings received and dated 23 June and 18 July 2005 which indicate additional detailing on top of gate. Gates and fences will be painted black.

No objection to issuance of permit for proposed alterations to front facade ONLY as shown in supplemental drawings received and dated 18 July 2005. Working drawings conform to approved concept. See previous Recommendation (OG 05-129). Refer the proposed demolition work and alterations to the historic building at the rear, which is not visible from public thoroughfare, to the Historic Preservation Review Board.

No objection to concept design for replacement of guard booths at Prospect and Canal Road entrances to Georgetown University as shown in supplemental drawings received and dated 6 July 2005. File new submission of working drawings with dimensions and details, with permit application for review by the Commission when ready.

No objection to issuance of permit for proposed removal of awning; new sign scheme including back-lit sign composed of letters no taller than 12-inches high reading 'Tumi', 4-inch high 'Tumi' decals on glass panes on sides of bay window, and new wood sign over second door; and repair of existing historic storefront bay window and entry door as shown in supplemental drawings received and dated 20 July 2005. Previously proposed alterations to existing bay window and entry door, and new projecting sign were NOT approved and have been deleted from this permit application.

Recommend AGAINST issuance of permit for projecting banner with sign reading 'Leopold's' at corner with Cady's Alley which, as proposed, exceeds size limit. File new submission of a revised banner no larger than 25-square feet and a color fabric sample with new permit application for review by the Commission when ready. Note is made that supports for banner were installed prior to review or permit. Note is made that permit application is pending final Zoning review which must be resolved prior to re-submission.

No objection to issuance of permit for proposed removal of stucco on stone wall and for reconstruction of stone and brick wall with gate on 29th Street, and for proposed repair and re-setting of existing sandstone front steps as shown in supplemental information received and dated 20 July 2005. Previously proposed replacement of steps and replacement of existing metal fence atop retaining wall were NOT approved and have been deleted from this application as shown in supplemental drawings received and dated 28 July 2005. Existing fence must be retained and repaired. Note is made that permit application is pending final Zoning review. Any modifications to the approved design as a result of further review in the permit process must be submitted to the Commission for approval.

No objection to proposed sign scheme for Georgetown Presbyterian Church composed of a hanging sign mounted on a 6-ft high pole with a rigid connection and a plaque by gate on brick wall as shown in supplemental drawings received and dated 20 July 2005. Note is made that permit application is pending final Zoning review. Any modifications to the approved design as a result of further review in the permit process must be submitted to the Commission for approval.

No objection to concept design for proposed two-story rear addition. File new submission of working drawings, including dimensions and details, for review by the Commission when ready.

Returned without Action. Concept case was withdrawn by written request of applicant.

No objection to issuance of permit for proposed alterations to front dormers and replacement basement door, and for proposed rear addition at roof level, including two roof terraces as shown in supplemental drawings received and dated 6 September 2005. Working drawings conform to approved concept. See previous Recommendation (OG 05-136). Note is made that permit application is pending final Zoning review. Any modifications to the approved design as a result of further review in the permit process must be submitted to the Commission for approval.

Returned without Action. Submitted materials and a site visit of 6 July 2005 indicate that proposed one-story rear addition to replace existing greenhouse will not be visible from public space. Refer to the Historic Preservation Review Board.

No objection to issuance of permit for proposed alterations, including removal of existing roofing on both structures; removal of rear dormer, vent, windows and doors at rear and basement level at 3512 P St.; and removal of garage door, front dormer, rear clerestory window and overhang at 3514 P St. as shown in drawings received and dated 24 June 2005. Proposed work is in coordination with previously approved work. See previous Recommendation (OG 05-102). Note is made that the Foundation for the Preservation of Historic Georgetown holds an easement on this property. Note is made that permit application is pending final Zoning review. Any modifications to the approved design as a result of further review in the permit process must be submitted to the Commission for approval.

No objection to issuance of permit for proposed addition of an awning over entrance door with ONLY address numbers on valance as shown in supplemental drawings received and dated 20 July 2005. New awning will be installed within masonry opening to match previously approved awnings. See previous Recommendation (OG 05-157).

Returned without Action. Submitted materials indicate that proposed alterations to rear for replacement door and patio will not be visible from public thoroughfare. Refer to the Historic Preservation Review Board. Note is made that permit application is pending final Zoning review. Any modifications to the proposed design as a result of further review in the permit process that would make the project visible from public space must be submitted to the Commission for review.