Old Georgetown Appendix: CFA Meeting — 16 June 2016

Returned without action. Permit application for site work has been inactive for an extended period of time.

Returned without action. Supplemental materials received 7 June 2016 locating proposed mechanical equipment at grade at rear yard, and site visit on 9 June 2016 indicate that equipment would not be visible from a public thoroughfare. Refer to the Historic Preservation Review Board. Note: Any subsequent modifications to the approved design, including those made during DCRA technical review, must be resubmitted to the Commission for approval prior to the issuance of a permit.

No objection to issuance of permit to remove existing asphalt shingles and install new copper roof with 1-inch standing seams and traditional detailing per supplemental drawings received 13 May 2016 PROVIDED seams are hand-pressed. Note: Any subsequent modifications to the approved design, including those made during DCRA technical review, must be resubmitted to the Commission for approval prior to the issuance of a permit.

Recommend AGAINST issuance of permit for proposed replacement asphalt shingle roof at this property; asphalt shingles are not considered compatible within the historic district. Recommend a standing seam metal roof, the appropriate solution for general compatibility within the historic district and its immediate context, rather than in-kind replacement of non-contributing (post-1950) building fabric.

No objection to issuance of permit for proposed security elements, including steel doors, and cameras per supplemental information received 15 June 2016 which indicate a flush-mounted camera next to door, and access panel no taller than 7 inches painted black. Note: Any subsequent modifications to the approved design, including those made during DCRA technical review, must be resubmitted to the Commission for approval prior to the issuance of a permit.

The Commission regrets that cameras with exposed conduit were installed prior to review or permit.  No objection to issuance of permit for proposed security elements, including access control panel with bronze finish, steel gate, and no more than four security cameras per supplemental information received 15 June 2016 PROVIDED existing camera at southeast corner is removed, new cameras are mounted above second story with no exposed conduit, camera at north elevation is relocated to eliminate or minimize visibility from a public thoroughfare, and two existing exposed conduits are painted beige to match brick color. Replacement front doors were not approved and were deleted from this permit application. Note: Any subsequent modifications to the approved design, including those made during DCRA technical review, must be resubmitted to the Commission for approval prior to the issuance of a permit.

No objection to concept design for proposed alterations to the FFB terrace, including removal of sails, new glass and metal canopy, and retractable shade per supplemental drawings received 11 May 2016. File new submission at DCRA of design development drawings with concept application for review by the Commission.

Returned without action. Concept application for new rear dormer has been inactive for an extended period of time.

Recommend AGAINST concept design for new garage at historic property which would remove much of remaining rear yard.

Returned without action. Permit application for exterior lighting has been inactive for an extended period of time.

Returned without action. Concept application for alterations has been inactive for an extended period of time.

Recommend AGAINST issuance of permit for proposed fence and gate. Applicant failed to provide requested information.

No objection to concept design for rear addition and alterations including new mansard roof with three shed dormers per supplemental drawings received 12 May 2016, PROVIDED metal roof is not prefinished and standing seams are hand-crimped. File new submission at DCRA of construction drawings, including details and specifications, with permit application for review by the Commission.

No objection to issuance of permit for replacement driveway gate at Bank Street and replacement sign at M Street entrance per drawings received 11 May 2016 PROVIDED control panel and exposed conduit are removed or painted black. Note: Any subsequent modifications to the approved design, including those made during DCRA technical review, must be resubmitted to the Commission for approval prior to the issuance of a permit.

No objection to issuance of permit for new storefront alterations per supplemental drawings received 2 June 2016, which indicate 8-inch mullion at show window, upper stories not painted, and painted wood mechanical enclosure at rear. Note: Sign is not a part of this permit application. Note: Any subsequent modifications to the approved design, including those made during DCRA technical review, must be resubmitted to the Commission for approval prior to the issuance of a permit.

No objection to issuance of permit for proposed alterations to K Street storefront, and signs reading "AMC Theatres" per drawings received 12 May 2016 which indicate signs on Wisconsin Avenue and 31st Street would have pin-mounted back-lit aluminum channel letters no taller than 12 inches, and sign on K Street would match installation detailing of existing sign. Note: Any subsequent modifications to the approved design, including those made during DCRA technical review, must be resubmitted to the Commission for approval prior to the issuance of a permit.

No objection to concept design for proposed alterations and replacement windows per supplemental drawings received 19 May 2016 which indicate wood windows and retention of segmental arches at rear ell PROVIDED 1956 eave line is continued along west wall, and proposed in-fill panels are wood rather than masonry. File new submission of construction drawings, including dimensions and details, with permit application for review by the Commission.

No objecting to concept design for two-story rear addition and site work per supplemental drawings received 12 May 2016. File new submission at DCRA of construction drawings, including details and dimensions, with permit application for review by the Commission.

No objection to issuance of permit for two back-lit signs with 9-inch-tall pin-mounted channel letters reading "Tuckernuck", and 2-inch-tall vinyl decals on glass per supplemental drawings received 31 May 2016. Metal logo at pier was not approved and was removed from permit application. Note: Any subsequent modifications to the approved design, including those made during DCRA technical review, must be resubmitted to the Commission for approval prior to the issuance of a permit.

No objection to concept design for two proposed antennas for Verizon Wireless PROVIDED antennas are set back from the edge of the roof such that bracing of sled mount is not visible from a public thoroughfare. File new submission at DCRA of working drawings, including dimensions and details, with permit application for review by the Commission.

Returned without action. Submitted materials and a site visit on 11 May 2016 indicate that revisions to permit for new rear bay at second floor would not be visible from a public thoroughfare. Refer to Historic Preservation Review Board.

No objection to concept design for proposed single antenna for Verizon Wireless PROVIDED antenna is set back from the edge of the roof such that bracing of sled mount is not visible from a public thoroughfare. File new submission at DCRA of working drawings, including dimensions and details, with permit application for review by the Commission.

No objection to issuance of permit for sign comprised of back-lit pin-mounted letters no taller than 9 inches reading "Kit Ace", 16-inches-tall logo, and decals on transom glazing per supplemental drawings received 1 June 2016. Note: Any subsequent modifications to the approved design, including those made during DCRA technical review, must be resubmitted to the Commission for approval prior to the issuance of a permit.

Submitted material is not sufficient for review. File new submission at DCRA of detailed and dimensioned drawings, and accurate photographs, with permit application for all-wood replacement windows for review by the Commission.

Returned without action. Submission materials and a site visit on 16 May 2016 indicate that reconstructed rear brick garden wall would not be visible from a public thoroughfare. Refer to the Historic Preservation Review Board.

The Commission regrets that rear alterations including 14-feet-tall lattice screen were erected without review or permit. No objection to issuance of permit for new 7-feet-tall wood fence along west property line PROVIDED 14-feet-tall lattice screen is removed per supplemental drawings dated 15 June 2016. Fence to be painted or stained with an opaque stain. Note: Any subsequent modifications to the approved design, including those made during DCRA technical review, must be resubmitted to the Commission for approval prior to the issuance of a permit.

Submitted material is not sufficient for review. File new submission at DCRA with accurate and dimensioned plans, elevations, and details drawings for all proposed alterations, with concept application for review by the Commission.

No objection to issuance of permit for proposed replacement gutters to match dimensions, profile, material and finish of existing gutters. Note: Any subsequent modifications to the approved design, including those made during DCRA technical review, must be resubmitted to the Commission for approval prior to the issuance of a permit.

Returned without action. Submission materials and a site visit on 16 May 2016 indicate that replacement fenestration at rear would not be visible from a public thoroughfare. Refer to the Historic Preservation Review Board. Note: Any subsequent modifications to the approved design, including those made during DCRA technical review, must be resubmitted to the Commission for approval prior to the issuance of a permit.

No objection to issuance of permit for proposed back-lit sign with 11-inches-tall aluminum channel letters reading "The Shade Store" and mounted on raceway above storefront cornice per drawings received 19 May 2016 which indicate temporary construction signs with only the retail name and "coming soon". Note: Any subsequent modifications to the approved design, including those made during DCRA technical review, must be resubmitted to the Commission for approval prior to the issuance of a permit.

No objection to issuance of permit for proposed wall-mounted non-illuminated sign with 12-inches-tall brushed aluminum letters reading "Escape Roof Live" and for vinyl decals with logos on storefront per supplemental drawings received 1 June 2016 which indicate logo on show window next to entry door is deleted. Note: Any subsequent modifications to the approved design, including those made during DCRA technical review, must be resubmitted to the Commission for approval prior to the issuance of a permit.

No objection to issuance of permit for replacement brick walls with new wood lattice at west and south per supplemental drawings received ___ June 2016. Note: Any subsequent modifications to the approved design, including those made during DCRA technical review, must be resubmitted to the Commission for approval prior to the issuance of a permit.

Submitted material is not sufficient for review. File new submission at DCRA with accurate and dimensioned site plan and detail drawings for retaining wall, stoop, and paved areas, with permit application for review by the Commission.

Returned without action. Submission materials and a site visit on 17 May 2016 indicate that rear alterations would not be visible from a public thoroughfare. Refer to the Historic Preservation Review Board.

No objection to issuance of permit for proposed alterations, including sidewalk cafe terrace, metal and glass canopy, roof deck with railing set back off parapet, 6-feet-tall IPE screen, mechanical equipment, and two signs per supplemental drawings received 1 June 2016 which indicate signs are not illuminated, and sign on north elevation is no taller than 8 inches PROVIDED all attachments through mortar joints. Parking kiosk, erected prior to review or permit, to be removed under this permit application. Note: Any subsequent modifications to the approved design, including those made during DCRA technical review, must be resubmitted to the Commission for approval prior to the issuance of a permit.

No objection to issuance of permit for proposed two-story rear addition, demolition at rear wall, and partial enclosure of two-story porch per drawings received 10 June 2016 which indicate all-wood insulated windows, doors and sidelights, and replacement of roof at ell to match existing PROVIDED that standing seams on unpainted galvanized steel roof are no taller than 1 inch and are hand crimped, and that width of simulated-divided-light muntins on all-wood windows and doors match width of muntins on front facade windows. Windows on front facade to be repaired. Note: Any subsequent modifications to the approved design, including those made during DCRA technical review, must be resubmitted to the Commission for approval prior to the issuance of a permit.

The Commission regrets that rear balconies and stair do not conform to approved design with metal railings. No objection to issuance of permit for proposed storefront alterations and replacement windows per drawings received 6 June 2016 which indicate all-wood 2/2 insulated windows with 1 3/4-inches-wide true-divided-light muntins, and 4-inches structural wood transom bars at doors to second floor. Signs are not part of this permit application. Recommend stabilization of collapsed historic structure at rear. Note: Any subsequent modifications to the approved design, including those made during DCRA technical review, must be resubmitted to the Commission for approval prior to the issuance of a permit.

Returned without action. Submission materials and a site visit on 16 May 2016 indicate that existing rooftop mechanical equipment would not be visible from a public thoroughfare. Refer to the Historic Preservation Review Board. Note: Any subsequent modifications to the approved design, including those made during DCRA technical review, must be resubmitted to the Commission for approval prior to the issuance of a permit.

No objection to issuance of permit for proposed repair of wood cornice with minimal replacement to match existing, and replacement of roof and skylight per drawings received 9 June 2016 which indicate front slope with standing seam aluminum roof with hand-pressed seams no taller than 1 inch at 16 inches on center and traditional detailing, PROVIDED metal roof is painted matte gray. The Commission regrets that ductwork is exposed on face of south elevation. Note: Any subsequent modifications to the approved design, including those made during DCRA technical review, must be resubmitted to the Commission for approval prior to the issuance of a permit.

No objection to issuance of permit for fenestration alterations including new wood casement windows, fixed sash with frosted glass behind brick openwork, and new wood garage door per drawings received 19 May 2016 which indicate existing metal gate and fence to remain. Note: Any subsequent modifications to the approved design, including those made during DCRA technical review, must be resubmitted to the Commission for approval prior to the issuance of a permit.

No objection to concept design for proposed fenestration alterations and new shed dormers per drawings received 19 May 2016, PROVIDED dormer sashes are reduced in size, single dormers are proposed at rear, and one new window is located at northeast corner. File new submission at DCRA of construction drawings, including details and dimensions, with permit application for review by the Commission.

Returned without action. Permit drawings and site visit on 21 April 2016 indicate the proposed rear yard site work and new pool house would not be visible from a public thoroughfare. Refer to the Historic Preservation Review Board.

Returned without action. Permit drawings and a site visit on 22 March 2016 indicate that fenestration alterations would not be visible from a public thoroughfare. Refer to Historic Preservation Review Board.

No objection to concept design for proposed replacement of roof and solar panels at ICC building per drawings received 19 May 2016. File new submission at DCRA of construction drawings, including details and dimensions, with permit application for review by the Commission.